Free Newsletter
Register for our Free Newsletters
Analysis, Inspection and Laboratory
Assisted/Independent Living
Clinical and Nursing Equipment
Design and Manufacture of Medical Equipment
Diagnostics Equipment, Monitoring and Test
Education, Training and Professional Services
Health Education and Patient Management
Health Estates Management
Healthcare Support and Information Services
Hygiene and Infection Control
IT and Communications in Healthcare
Medical Device Technology
Research and Development
Safety and Security
View All
Other Carouselweb publications
Carousel Web
Defense File
New Materials
Pro Health Zone
Pro Health Zone
Pro Security Zone
Web Lec
Pro Engineering Zone
Editor's Blog and Industry Comments

Telecare audit shows reablement funding has failed to help social care across England

18 September, 2012
The Good Governance Institute (GGI) has carried out a telecare audit which has found significant variations in the number of local authorities delivering telecare services, and the number of people within authorities currently being supported by telecare across England.

The audit, Care and support at home: an audit of telecare services in England, was compiled from Freedom of Information Act requests and completed by 121 upper-tier and unitary local authorities in England.  The audit found that, despite 1.5 million people currently using telecare in England, responses from the councils only accounted for a fraction of this figure.


According to the audit, £28 million of the additional £648 million allocated to local authorities to fund more capacity for home care support, investment in equipment, adaptations and telecare in social care services, went towards funding telecare.  Forty three percent of PCTs saw no investment in telecare services for their area, particularly in the South West and East Anglia. The audit also revealed that one in five councils reported receiving no re-ablement funding from their local primary care organisation in 2011/12.


The findings from the audit also supported existing evidence that telecare can achieve real cost savings for commissioners of social care through preventing or delaying the need for intensive care packages, referring to Wakefield Council’s reported net savings of £1.3m during a six-month period. Despite this, only one third of the local authorities actually carried out an assessment into the savings delivered by telecare


Although 80 percent of local authorities confirmed they had eligibility criteria or assessment processes in place for telecare services, these were found to be inconsistent across the country. Some councils, such as Leicestershire County Council and Walsall Council, confirmed that they had chosen to make telecare universally available, with nearly half of the local authorities that responded saying they had undertaken an assessment of the outcomes delivered by their telecare services.


Dr John Bullivant, Chairman of the Good Governance Institute said: "Adult social care services in England are facing unsustainable pressures. An aging population coupled with fiscal constraints means that new ways of funding and commissioning social care need to be explored and initiated, including the use of telecare services. Despite the Government's commitment to increase the uptake of telecare and telehealth, access to these services varies greatly across the country."


"One of the key drivers for this variation is the fact that there are differences in assessment between local authority commissioners, combined with a lack of guidance around telecare implementation and incentives for its introduction. Our audit also found mixed understanding among local authorities commissioners on what telecare services are, and how they should be incorporated into the council’s social services."

Bookmark and Share
Home I Editor's Blog I News by Zone I News by Date I News by Category I Special Reports I Directory I Events I Advertise I Submit Your News I About Us I Guides
   © 2012
Netgains Logo